<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ken McGuire &#187; Spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kenmc.com/category/spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kenmc.com</link>
	<description>Irish Technology Blogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:02:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Stumbleupon, Spammers and WordPress 2.5</title>
		<link>http://kenmc.com/2008/04/04/stumbleupon-spammers-and-wordpress-25/</link>
		<comments>http://kenmc.com/2008/04/04/stumbleupon-spammers-and-wordpress-25/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 20:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken McGuire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[akismet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popularity contest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stumbleupon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress 2.5]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kenmc.com/?p=1141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I&#8217;ve had a manic enough week in the office, I grabbed some time yesterday to poke around recent web stats and tackle personal email building up in my inbox. The two things I noticed? Four out of five blog posts I&#8217;ve penned recently have been picked up by Stumbleupon users, so &#8211; welcome SU [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I&#8217;ve had a manic enough week in the office, I grabbed some time yesterday to poke around recent web stats and tackle personal email building up in my inbox. The two things I noticed?</p>
<p>Four out of five blog posts I&#8217;ve penned recently have been picked up by <a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com">Stumbleupon</a> users, so &#8211; welcome SU users. I hope you&#8217;ve enjoyed the articles you&#8217;ve found and have been reading &#8211; plus I hope <a href="http://www.kenmc.com/2008/03/30/wordpress-25-is-live-and-wild-plus-popularity-contest-notes/">the assistance with the Popularity Contest plugin</a> has helped, though Alex King will be releasing a fully WP compatible version shortly. </p>
<p>The other thing I notice, as I sift through my email, is that the spammers were certainly out in force this week &#8211; trackbacks and comments alike. Clear out Akismet and it&#8217;s slowly but surely begins filling up again &#8211; and again, and again and again. Is there an issue with <a href="http://www.akismet.com">Akismet</a> or has there just been a global increase in spam activity for the week?</p>
<p>Finally, I will say that I&#8217;m enjoying the use of WordPress 2.5. The media gallery has taken some getting used to but functionality-wise and from an end-user&#8217;s point of view I think it&#8217;s bang on.</p>
<p>Now, it&#8217;s time for the weekend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kenmc.com/2008/04/04/stumbleupon-spammers-and-wordpress-25/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Smell A Splog &#8211; Ideahustle.com</title>
		<link>http://kenmc.com/2007/10/09/i-smell-a-splog-ideahustlecom/</link>
		<comments>http://kenmc.com/2007/10/09/i-smell-a-splog-ideahustlecom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 08:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken McGuire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kenmc.com/2007/10/09/i-smell-a-splog-ideahustlecom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Keith found his feeds republished last week, I&#8217;ve found the same this week with ideahustle.com. Not only is my kenmc.com feed appearing (with trackbacks on all posts made thus far in the week) but so to is my KilkennyMusic.com feed and Devious Theatre feed. Would Ideahustle republish a feed that has me criticise whoever [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://www.kenmc.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/ideahustle.gif' alt='Ideahustle' /></p>
<p>As <a href="http://bohanna.typepad.com/pureplay/2007/10/should-i-take-t.html">Keith found his feeds republished</a> last week, I&#8217;ve found the same this week with ideahustle.com. Not only is my kenmc.com feed appearing (with trackbacks on all posts made thus far in the week) but so to is my KilkennyMusic.com feed and Devious Theatre feed.</p>
<p>Would Ideahustle republish a feed that has me criticise whoever is behind the adsense heavy blog? It looks to be a wordpress mu installation using ripped feeds to populate a wide variety of blogs. No link from me but check ideahustle.com for yourself.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.kilkennymusic.com/video/votd-nirvana-dumb-unplugged/">Original KKM post</a> that was ripped above (posted around 8:30am this morning)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kenmc.com/2007/10/09/i-smell-a-splog-ideahustlecom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1 Billion Spam Comments In 108 Days</title>
		<link>http://kenmc.com/2007/07/11/1-billion-spam-comments-in-108-days/</link>
		<comments>http://kenmc.com/2007/07/11/1-billion-spam-comments-in-108-days/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken McGuire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kenmc.com/2007/07/11/1-billion-spam-comments-in-108-days/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or so says Akismet in their latest stats update. I know that across all the blogs I run or lend a hand in authoring and managing that there&#8217;s been a serious uptake in the amount of spam comments. Hell, Squidoo even got in on the act (or squidoo pages) and are now feeling the wrath [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or so says <a href="http://blog.akismet.com/2007/07/11/two-billion/">Akismet</a> in their latest stats update. I know that across all the blogs I run or lend a hand in authoring and managing that there&#8217;s been a serious uptake in the amount of spam comments. Hell, Squidoo even got in on the act (or squidoo pages) and are now f<a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/10/google-acting-against-squidoo-due-to-spam/">eeling the wrath of Google</a> because of it.</p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.akismet.com/stats">Akismet</a>&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>
Total spam:	2,044,449,936<br />
Total ham:	131,167,720</p></blockquote>
<p>I do know one thing though, there&#8217;s nothing I&#8217;d rather have than Akismet keeping spam away from the blogs. One of the greatest things to fit into WordPress ever. Fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kenmc.com/2007/07/11/1-billion-spam-comments-in-108-days/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spammers Using Flickr As Bait</title>
		<link>http://kenmc.com/2007/07/09/spammers-using-flickr-as-bait/</link>
		<comments>http://kenmc.com/2007/07/09/spammers-using-flickr-as-bait/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 09:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken McGuire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kenmc.com/2007/07/09/spammers-using-flickr-as-bait/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Caught this one in the mail this morning&#8230;. bravo. Hey, I dont know if you already know or if its the same person, but I&#8217;ve seen your EXACT pictures on another site. I copied the link if u want to check it out. The person is trying to pass it off as saying that its [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Caught this one in the mail this morning&#8230;. bravo.</p>
<blockquote><p>Hey, I dont know if you already know or if its the same<br />
person, but I&#8217;ve seen your EXACT pictures on another site.<br />
I copied the link if u want to check it out.  The person is<br />
trying to pass it off as saying that its his/hers<br />
pictures&#8230;.</p>
<p>who knows tho&#8230;maybe that person might be the real owner<br />
and this flickr account you have is the fake one?</p>
<p>in any case thought i&#8217;d just message you to let you know.</p>
<p>here&#8217;s that link to that page:</p>
<p>http://www.meetwonderfulpeople.com/members/87956512SF9855646.php</p>
<p>um, i dont know if you&#8217;ll be able to see the pix, cuz the<br />
site requires u to be logged in, the site is free<br />
registration anyways.</p>
<p>laters<br />
-Chris</p></blockquote>
<p>Gimme a break&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kenmc.com/2007/07/09/spammers-using-flickr-as-bait/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Looking At The Spam Statistics</title>
		<link>http://kenmc.com/2007/05/17/looking-at-the-spam-statistics/</link>
		<comments>http://kenmc.com/2007/05/17/looking-at-the-spam-statistics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 08:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken McGuire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kenmc.com/2007/05/17/looking-at-the-spam-statistics/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Massive percentage increase in the number of spam comments towards kenmc.com in recent months. It had taken me from October 2005 to February 2007 to amass 5,000 spam comments in Akismet. Since that date in February (6th) to this morning, May 17th there&#8217;s been over 25,000 more comments with the current figure Akismet is spitting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Massive percentage increase in the number of spam comments towards kenmc.com in recent months. It had taken me from October 2005 to February 2007 to amass <a href="http://www.kenmc.com/2007/02/06/over-5000-reasons-to-be-thankful/">5,000 spam comments in Akismet</a>.</p>
<p>Since that date in February (6th) to this morning, May 17th there&#8217;s been over 25,000 more comments with the current figure <a href="http://www.akismet.com">Akismet</a> is spitting out standing at 31,254. Thats a fairly big percentage increase in just over three months wouldn&#8217;t you think? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kenmc.com/2007/05/17/looking-at-the-spam-statistics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Those Spammers Strike Again</title>
		<link>http://kenmc.com/2007/03/22/those-spammers-strike-again/</link>
		<comments>http://kenmc.com/2007/03/22/those-spammers-strike-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken McGuire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kenmc.com/2007/03/22/those-spammers-strike-again/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Damn them all to hell&#8230;. MODERATORS &#8211; This is a test from an automated software aimed at posting to &#8220;dead&#8221; forums only. If this is not an abandoned forum we apologize, simply block this nickname and we&#8217;ll not attempt to post again. This one (above) just popped up on KilkennyMusic.com&#8217;s forum. Upgraded to latest version [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn them all to hell&#8230;.</p>
<blockquote><p>MODERATORS &#8211; This is a test from an automated software aimed at posting to &#8220;dead&#8221; forums only. If this is not an abandoned forum we apologize, simply block this nickname and we&#8217;ll not attempt to post again. </p></blockquote>
<p>This one (above) just popped up on KilkennyMusic.com&#8217;s forum. Upgraded to latest version of phpBB and they&#8217;re still coming&#8230; time to make a few additions to the scripts I guess. Maybe a timer check? I&#8217;m only guessing that bots are filling out forms in record time, as well as avoiding the graphic captcha. Anyone been in a similar position? </p>
<p>Between the increase in forum spam as well as a heavily noted increase in blog spam across the board it is getting a little tiring&#8230;</p>
<p>At least in this case it wasn&#8217;t extreme NSFW links&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kenmc.com/2007/03/22/those-spammers-strike-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spam From The New York Times?</title>
		<link>http://kenmc.com/2007/03/15/spam-from-the-new-york-times/</link>
		<comments>http://kenmc.com/2007/03/15/spam-from-the-new-york-times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken McGuire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kenmc.com/2007/03/15/spam-from-the-new-york-times/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is someone inside the New York Times trying to reach out to blogs or is there someone sitting at home spamming away, PRETENDING to be from the New York Times? Amongst the new wave of spam mails and comments I&#8217;ve been filtering come comments from the New York Times &#8211; not only on this blog [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is someone inside the New York Times trying to reach out to blogs or is there someone sitting at home spamming away, PRETENDING to be from the New York Times? Amongst the new wave of spam mails and comments I&#8217;ve been filtering come comments from the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com">New York Times</a> &#8211; not only on this blog but Aidan has also noticed it for <a href="http://www.helpyourself.ie">HelpYourself.ie</a> The comments look legit, there&#8217;s no links only one going back to the New York Times homepage.</p>
<p>Reading <a href="http://www.techscape.tv/2007/03/14/is-the-new-york-times-spamming-blogs/">techscape.tv</a> this morning, it isn&#8217;t just here the comments are appearing&#8230;</p>
<p>Just on another note&#8230; is anyone getting empty comments from non-existant posts via mail asking you to moderate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kenmc.com/2007/03/15/spam-from-the-new-york-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Apologises For Malware Installs</title>
		<link>http://kenmc.com/2007/02/21/microsoft-apologises-for-malware-installs/</link>
		<comments>http://kenmc.com/2007/02/21/microsoft-apologises-for-malware-installs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken McGuire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kenmc.com/2007/02/21/microsoft-apologises-for-malware-installs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whoever approves ads for Windows Live Messenger could possibly be looking for a new job this week. Microsoft have come out and apologised publicly for advertising Errorsafe, a known malware application, for the past few days across the Live network. The banners inside the Windows Live Messenger advertised Errorsafe, an application that claims to detect [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoever approves ads for Windows Live Messenger could possibly be looking for a new job this week. Microsoft have come out and apologised publicly  for advertising Errorsafe, a known malware application, for the past few days across the Live network.</p>
<blockquote><p>The banners inside the Windows Live Messenger advertised Errorsafe, an application that claims to detect and repair computer problems. The software is notorious because it often gets installed without the user&#8217;s permission and because it presents false security warnings that are intended to make the user purchase a licensed copy of the software. (<a href="http://www.pcauthority.com.au/news.aspx?CIaNID=46180">via</a>)/blockquote></p>
<p>Microsoft&#8217;s response?</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote><p>We apologise for the inconvenience and are reviewing our ad approval process to reduce the chance of an occurrence such as this happening again.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hopefully they don&#8217;t take as long as Aer Lingus do in reviewing their handling of customer complaints. After listening to Ray D&#8217;Arcy in the office yesterday (the watchdog slot) it seems they&#8217;ve a long way to go on a promise made many moons ago&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kenmc.com/2007/02/21/microsoft-apologises-for-malware-installs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Apologetic Spammer</title>
		<link>http://kenmc.com/2007/02/14/the-apologetic-spammer/</link>
		<comments>http://kenmc.com/2007/02/14/the-apologetic-spammer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 08:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken McGuire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kenmc.com/2007/02/14/the-apologetic-spammer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a new one&#8230; Kakabadan wrote: Sorry, I NEED to send you this messages, because I need money for medicaments Followed by enough links to videos to put the local adult movie shop to shame. Do they think throwing in an apology is really going to entice people to shop for viagra, porn and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a new one&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>Kakabadan wrote:<br />
Sorry, I NEED to send you this messages, because I need money for medicaments<br />
 <img src='http://kenmc.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />
</p></blockquote>
<p>Followed by enough links to videos to put the local adult movie shop to shame. Do they think throwing in an apology is really going to entice people to shop for viagra, porn and trawl through the dozens of links in the mail?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kenmc.com/2007/02/14/the-apologetic-spammer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PHPBB And Spam</title>
		<link>http://kenmc.com/2007/02/13/phpbb-and-spam/</link>
		<comments>http://kenmc.com/2007/02/13/phpbb-and-spam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 08:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken McGuire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kenmc.com/2007/02/13/phpbb-and-spam/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is anyone running an install of phpBB (the forum software) that suffers a lot from visits by unfriendly spam bots? I look after three sites which have full installs of phpBB, all three are two subversions behind the latest release &#8211; but thats ok. Two of them don&#8217;t suffer any spam problems. One of them [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is anyone running an install of phpBB (the forum software) that suffers a lot from visits by unfriendly spam bots? I look after <a href="http://www.kilkennymusic.com">three</a> <a href="http://www.devioustheatre.com">sites</a> <a href="http://www.yifm.com">which</a> have full installs of phpBB, all three are two subversions behind the latest release &#8211; but thats ok. Two of them don&#8217;t suffer any spam problems. One of them is just six months &#8216;younger&#8217; than the spammed forum. </p>
<p>The spammed forum in question doesn&#8217;t allow the public read access unless you&#8217;re logged in. A user must also click a link in an activation email &#8211; you think that would at least work, but no! So I add a graphical captcha to the user registration forms (something that doesn&#8217;t exist on the other two), it is six alphanumeric characters strong, combination of uppercase, lowercase and numbers but it STILL doesn&#8217;t solve the problem.</p>
<p>What was a great automated feature has now meant there is an admin team manually approving registrations on a daily basis and deleting anywhere between three and ten spambot registrations a day.</p>
<p>Anyone ever have a similar problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kenmc.com/2007/02/13/phpbb-and-spam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whats With The Essays (Spam)?</title>
		<link>http://kenmc.com/2006/11/22/whats-with-the-essays-spam/</link>
		<comments>http://kenmc.com/2006/11/22/whats-with-the-essays-spam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 08:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken McGuire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kenmc.com/2006/11/22/whats-with-the-essays-spam/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Picked up a spam comment yesterday &#8211; not your regular run of the mill casino gambling rubbish or random letters and numbers, but 12 A4 pages and 6,737 words (thank you MS Word) on why women are the favoured gender and &#8220;Christianity is a dumping ground for the disfavored&#8221; amongst other things. I&#8217;ve had two [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Picked up a spam comment yesterday &#8211; not your regular run of the mill casino gambling rubbish or random letters and numbers, but 12 A4 pages and 6,737 words (thank you MS Word) on why women are the favoured gender and &#8220;Christianity is a dumping ground for the disfavored&#8221; amongst other things. I&#8217;ve had two or three of these of late on this blog that slip past <a href="http://akismet.com/">Akismet</a> and have appeared on both <a href="http://www.liverpoolaccess.com">LiverpoolAccess.com</a> and <a href="http://www.thefootballtimes.com">TheFootballTimes.com</a>. Anyone else in the same boat?</p>
<p>Interesting point, while my post yesterday suggested that <a href="http://www.kenmc.com/2006/11/21/90-of-email-now-spam/">90% of all email is spam</a>, the Akismet site reports that 93% of all comments to blogs are now spam as well.</p>
<p>Update: Looks like <a href="http://waltproject.blogspot.com/">Rosanne</a> (old college friend, female (yes, shock and awe of late!) blogger, fellow WIT BScIT/MM graduate!) is <a href="http://waltproject.blogspot.com/2006/11/why-all-spam.html">having the same problems</a>&#8230; Rosanne is currently looking into weblogs as a learning tool as part of the masters, give it a read!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kenmc.com/2006/11/22/whats-with-the-essays-spam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>90% Of Email Now Spam</title>
		<link>http://kenmc.com/2006/11/21/90-of-email-now-spam/</link>
		<comments>http://kenmc.com/2006/11/21/90-of-email-now-spam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken McGuire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tutorials]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kenmc.com/2006/11/21/90-of-email-now-spam/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Its me Jamie. Its me Lynette. Its me Justin. I&#8217;m getting sick and tired of these emails, the latest wave of junk mail passing through the office at the moment. Simple emails with random names after &#8220;its me&#8221; in the subject line just to add to my morning woes of clearing out the junk mail. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its me Jamie.</p>
<p>Its me Lynette.</p>
<p>Its me Justin.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m getting sick and tired of these emails, the latest wave of junk mail passing through the office at the moment. Simple emails with random names after &#8220;its me&#8221; in the subject line just to add to my morning woes of clearing out the junk mail. Then again, these are just the latest addition to the high amounts of spam we already have to filter through.</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://www.digital-lifestyles.info/display_page.asp?section=business&#038;id=3892">Digital Lifestyles</a> now, the internet is truely under siege with &#8220;just over 90%&#8221; of email now junk mail. Figures estimate that the level of spam circling online has almost trebled from 2.5 billion mails in June to around 7 billion mails in November, still with a week left in the month.</p>
<p>Thats some size of an increase over such a short period (5 months give or take), even with new spam legislation in place. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.sitedeveloper.ws/">Site Developer</a> has a handy spam tutorial for users of Outlook, without delving into any additional software (though I know the source of the bulk of our spam and I&#8217;ll be putting an end to it within the next month) which is <a href="http://www.sitedeveloper.ws/tutorials/spam.htm">available here</a>.</p>
<p>While there are loads of <a href="http://www.spamfighter.com/">commercial</a> <a href="http://www.openfieldsoftware.com/">options</a> available for beating spam, HelpYourself.ie (Aidan and Keith&#8217;s monthly talk) points to <a href="http://keir.net/k9.html">K9</a> as a free application to help you beat spam out of your inbox.</p>
<p>Now, where did I leave my own spam beating stick?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kenmc.com/2006/11/21/90-of-email-now-spam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

