<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Page Views Are Dead &#8211; What Comes Next?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kenmc.com/2006/12/20/page-views-are-dead-what-comes-next/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kenmc.com/2006/12/20/page-views-are-dead-what-comes-next/</link>
	<description>Irish Technology Blogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 15:09:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: TechnoCloud &#187; From page views to old news</title>
		<link>http://kenmc.com/2006/12/20/page-views-are-dead-what-comes-next/comment-page-1/#comment-3816</link>
		<dc:creator>TechnoCloud &#187; From page views to old news</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 18:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kenmc.com/2006/12/20/page-views-are-dead-what-comes-next/#comment-3816</guid>
		<description>[...] Interesting post from Micropersuasion adding to the growing questioning of page views as a meaningful metric. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Interesting post from Micropersuasion adding to the growing questioning of page views as a meaningful metric. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://kenmc.com/2006/12/20/page-views-are-dead-what-comes-next/comment-page-1/#comment-2959</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 16:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kenmc.com/2006/12/20/page-views-are-dead-what-comes-next/#comment-2959</guid>
		<description>Not sure I agree with &quot;a â€™statistics standardâ€™ should be in place?    

What really needs to take place (and it is starting to happen, but slowly) is allowing site owners to define what is important to them on the &quot;page&quot; by a series of events and attribution (or accreditation) of events by the Visitor or set of visits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure I agree with &#8220;a â€™statistics standardâ€™ should be in place?    </p>
<p>What really needs to take place (and it is starting to happen, but slowly) is allowing site owners to define what is important to them on the &#8220;page&#8221; by a series of events and attribution (or accreditation) of events by the Visitor or set of visits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken McGuire</title>
		<link>http://kenmc.com/2006/12/20/page-views-are-dead-what-comes-next/comment-page-1/#comment-2958</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken McGuire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 16:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kenmc.com/2006/12/20/page-views-are-dead-what-comes-next/#comment-2958</guid>
		<description>Exactly, moreso in an ajax environment where pages are literally irrelevant. Even in the most dynamic environments though we don&#039;t have enough of a common ground with statistics - whether page views, visits, visitors, or otherwise. Maybe a &#039;statistics standard&#039; should be in place?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly, moreso in an ajax environment where pages are literally irrelevant. Even in the most dynamic environments though we don&#8217;t have enough of a common ground with statistics &#8211; whether page views, visits, visitors, or otherwise. Maybe a &#8216;statistics standard&#8217; should be in place?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://kenmc.com/2006/12/20/page-views-are-dead-what-comes-next/comment-page-1/#comment-2957</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 16:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kenmc.com/2006/12/20/page-views-are-dead-what-comes-next/#comment-2957</guid>
		<description>Page Views, as outdated as they maybe, were never meant to be a representation &quot;of how many people actually use your site&quot;   That&#039;s what Visitors and Visits are there for.   Page Views, as you know, were born out the fact that a &quot;hit&quot; was an overinflated measurement from the days of log-based file applications.   

Page Views should always be used in conjunction with Visits and Visitors in order to understand depth of site visits or visitors by certain segments.

Page Views are increasingly (and quickly) becoming irrelevant in the face of new web technologies that allow sites better user experience (like ajax) but are no longer page views, but an event or series of events.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Page Views, as outdated as they maybe, were never meant to be a representation &#8220;of how many people actually use your site&#8221;   That&#8217;s what Visitors and Visits are there for.   Page Views, as you know, were born out the fact that a &#8220;hit&#8221; was an overinflated measurement from the days of log-based file applications.   </p>
<p>Page Views should always be used in conjunction with Visits and Visitors in order to understand depth of site visits or visitors by certain segments.</p>
<p>Page Views are increasingly (and quickly) becoming irrelevant in the face of new web technologies that allow sites better user experience (like ajax) but are no longer page views, but an event or series of events.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

